GETTING MY CASE LAW ON DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS TO WORK

Getting My case law on disciplinary proceedings To Work

Getting My case law on disciplinary proceedings To Work

Blog Article

9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair on the offender and also the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It can be well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to your offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

The ruling from the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts until finally or Until possibly new legislation is created, or simply a higher court rules differently.

184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as established forth would not apply, because the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, relatively he has long been acquitted from the criminal charges based on evidence and it truly is very well-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted within the criminal case, then on this really charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment because of the department and held him disqualified with the post because acquittal for all future purposes. The aforesaid proposition is set at naught with the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case with the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.

In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of the laws, the legal system adheres on the doctrine of stare decisis

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid on the Supreme Court, guaranteeing the enforcement of its judgments. Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become attained, the decision with the Supreme Court click here needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. Read more

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it truly is unclear how it applies to any offered situation, typically rendering judgments based about the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances with the case at hand. These decisions become a guide for upcoming similar cases.

The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty day period report towards the court, the worker elaborated around the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.

As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to possibly party and also the case shall be decided by the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more

The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information being gathered from the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is usually important to note that neither seniority nor promotion would be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could be claimed or granted without the actual size of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular length of service for becoming entitled to get thought of for promotion to your higher grade, of course, is not really without logic as the officer that is at first inducted to the particular post needs to serve over the stated post to gain experience to hold the next higher post also to serve the public inside of a befitting way.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is usually a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.

Report this page